Modification History
- Writing Software
- Manuscripts 1 2 6 – Writing Tool For Complex Documents Electronically
- Manuscripts 1 2 6 – Writing Tool For Complex Documents Apa
Release | Comments |
Release 1 | This version first released with BSB Business Services Training Package Version 1.0. |
Application
This unit describes the skills and knowledge required to plan documents, draft text, prepare final text and produce documents of some complexity.
Topic 1: Plan documents 1 1Aetermine the document purpose D 2 1Bhoose appropriate document format C 6 1Cstablish the means of communication E 14 1Determine document requirements D 18 1Eetermine content and order D 26 1Fevelop an overview of structure and content D 31 Summary36 Learning checkpoint 1: Plan documents 37. 1.1 Determine the purposes of documents. 1.2 Choose appropriate formats for documents. 1.3 Establish means of communication. 1.4 Determine requirements of documents. 1.5 Determine categories and logical sequences of data, information and knowledge to achieve document objectives. 1.6 Develop overview of structure and content of documents. Scrivener is worth every penny: quite simply, it’s the best writers tool there is. Zoe Margolis, best-selling author. Scrivener is the biggest leap forward in writing software since the venerable days of WordPerfect, and believe me, I’ve tried them all. Antony Johnston, comics writer and novelist.
Writing Software
It applies to individuals who work in a range of business environments and are skilled in the creation of reports, information and general promotion documents that are more complex than basic correspondence, memos or forms and that require review and analysis of a range of information sources.
No licensing, legislative or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Unit Sector
Communication – Writing
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 Plan documents | 1.1 Determine the purposes of documents 1.2 Choose appropriate formats for documents 1.3 Establish means of communication 1.4 Determine requirements of documents 1.5 Determine categories and logical sequences of data, information and knowledge to achieve document objectives 1.6 Develop overview of structure and content of documents Ipack 2 3 4 – full featured compressed archive manager. |
2 Draft text | 2.1 Review and organise available data, information and knowledge according to proposed structure and content 2.2 Ensure data, information and knowledge is aggregated, interpreted and summarised to prepare text that satisfies document purposes and objectives 2.3 Include graphics as appropriate 2.4 Identify gaps in required data and information, and collect additional material from relevant enterprise personnel 2.5 Draft text according to document requirements and genre 2.6 Use language appropriate to the audience |
3 Prepare final text | 3.1 Review draft text to ensure document objectives are achieved and requirements are met 3.2 Check grammar, spelling and style for accuracy and punctuation 3.3 Ensure draft text is approved by relevant enterprise personnel 3.4 Incorporate revisions in final copy |
4 Produce document | 4.1 Choose basic design elements for documents appropriate to audience and purpose 4.2 Use word processing software to apply basic design elements to text 4.3 Check documents to ensure all requirements are met |
Foundation Skills
This section describes language, literacy, numeracy and employment skills incorporated in the performance criteria that are required for competent performance.
Skill | Performance Criteria | Description |
Reading | 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 4.3 |
|
Writing | 1.6, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 3.2, 3.4, 4.1 |
|
Oral Communication | 1.1, 1.4, 2.4, 3.3 |
|
Navigate the world of work | 1.4, 4.3 |
|
Interact with others | 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 2.4, 3.3 |
|
Get the work done | 1.1-1.6, 2.1-2.5, 3.3, 4.1-4.2 |
|
Unit Mapping Information
Code and title current version | Code and title previous version | Comments | Equivalence status |
BSBWRT401 Write complex documents | BSBWRT401A Write complex documents | Updated to meet Standards for Training Packages | Equivalent unit |
![Manuscripts 1 2 6 – writing tool for complex documents list Manuscripts 1 2 6 – writing tool for complex documents list](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6b/1a/17/6b1a172474f5e7c718e55855f9ee11b2.png)
Links
Companion Volume implementation guides are found in VETNet - https://vetnet.gov.au/Pages/TrainingDocs.aspx?q=11ef6853-ceed-4ba7-9d87-4da407e23c10
The Duplicating of Manuscripts.
The Duplicating of Manuscripts.
![Manuscripts 1 2 6 – Writing Tool For Complex Documents Manuscripts 1 2 6 – Writing Tool For Complex Documents](https://cdn.britannica.com/58/142358-004-27F76B05.jpg)
1) Writing material.
Parchment, made from the hides of different animals had been used as writing material as far back as the fourth Dynasty in Egyptin 2600 B.C. Papyrus later became the common writing material. At around 200 B.C. the export of papyrus to the Greek world was temporarily banned. At that time, a large industry for the preparing of parchment was founded in Pergamum, hence the name. Parchment was used for the making of scrolls, but because it is much more expensive than papyrus, it was mostly used for documents that needed a very long lifespan. Therefore the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament was copied mostly on parchment. Most probably it was to some of these scrolls that Paul referred when he wrote to Timothy asking him to bring along “…my scrolls, especially the parchments.“ (2Tim.4:13)
In the beginning of the Christian era, both parchment and papyrus scrolls were commonly used as writing material. A scroll usually was about ten meter (±35Ft.) in length, and could contain a document about the size of a gospel. That is why Luke wrote his gospel and the Acts as two separate documents. In the same manner the epistles of Paul were gathered in one scroll, as were the Catholic Epistles, Hebrews, and the Revelation to John.
In the beginning each gospel was used in the area for which it had been written. Mark was the gospel for Rome and Italy; Matthew was probably used in the greater area of Syria by the Greek speaking Jews; Luke and the Acts were used in Greece and Asia Minor, while the Gospel of John was used in the churches he planted.
Towards the close of the first or the beginning of the second century, the codex or book was invented. To a great extent it replaced the papyrus or parchment scrolls. Very soon the Christians preferred the codex to the scroll for int.al. the following reasons: 1) Although it was difficult to write on the reverse side of papyrus due to the vertical grain, the codex made it more viable to use both sides. This was a huge financial advantage. 2) The codex was more compact. Consequently all the gospels or even the whole Bible could be contained in one volume instead of many scrolls. 3) It was much easier to compare or consult different documents for there was no need to roll down the whole scroll to the verse in question. 4) It confirmed their autonomy apart from Judaism in a concrete way.
As time went by, the different documents of the New Testament were gathered and published as one codex or book. As a result, the different books gathered in one codex could display typical characteristics that differ from the other. For instance, the codex Koridethi from the ninth century portrays typical characteristics of the text known in Caesarea in Mark, while the other gospels are typical to the text known in Antioch.
Because papyrus had been used as the more general writing material for making copies of the New Testament documents, those papyrus manuscripts that survived are of exceptional value. For it represents the oldest witnesses of the New Testament. More than 81 papyrus witnesses of the New Testament are known to us. They date mostly from the second to the fifth centuries.
Manuscripts 1 2 6 – Writing Tool For Complex Documents Electronically
The oldest, (p52) can be dated during the time of Trajan. (98-117A.D.) Although this tiny fragment contains only John 18:31-33 and 37-38, it is unquestionable evidence that the Gospel of John had been written long before 160, as some earlier researchers believed.
Noteburner itunes audio converter 2 1 4 download free. Due to the brittle nature of papyrus, we do not have a complete manuscript of the New Testament on papyrus. Of most, only a few fragments have survived. Yet their value as oldest and therefore nearest to the original autograph, is incalculable. They serve as witnesses to compare later more complete manuscripts, and in that way discern their correctness.
By about the year 200 A.D. parchment and its superior form called vellum, almost completely replaced papyrus as writing material for the make of copies of the New Testament. It was much more durable and both sides of the page could be used with ease. Most of the witnesses of the New Testament are written on parchment, some containing also the Old Testament and also some of the apocrypha.
(Extract from Codex Sinaiticus, showing Uncial Letter Type)
Up to the tenth century all important manuscripts were written in a letter type, called uncials, comparable with our capital letters. About 200 uncial witnesses have been studied and evaluated in full. This forms the main corpus of manuscripts utilized to compile a basic Greek text. This text is used by most Bible societies for making modern translations.
Because parchment was so expensive, the parchment of an old document was not disposed of when replaced with a new copy. The old parchment was scraped and washed and then used for a next document. Sometimes this old parchment was also used in the binding of a new codex. Luckily we today can treat this parchment with certain chemicals und study and decipher the original script under ultraviolet light. These documents are called palimpsests. No less than 52 palimpsest witnesses of the New Testament have survived.
Manuscripts 1 2 6 – Writing Tool For Complex Documents Apa
When we are used to one version of the Bible, we can easily doubt any other version. Rather look at the causes for the differences and weigh objectively.
If you have any rendering that troubles you, feel free to post it on this blog and I promise to give all the facts available in plain English.
God Bless!
Herman.